Island Art Controversy

Island Detail | Island Public Assemby Map | All Islands Map | Get Directions To Here

Islands of LA recently learned that one of the largest public art controversies occurred in 1992 on a traffic island in South Bronx in front of the 44th Police Precinct.  The public art works by John Ahearn were done in the wake of the Tilted Art controversy, a work by Richard Serra that was built in 1981 and removed in 1989 after a lengthy and contentions life.   It was an attempt to work with an artist that was from the community and whose work spoke to the community.  After 3 years of meetings, discussions, negotations, a multi-departmental panel approved three life sized sculptures. Within moments of its installation, a brouhaha erupted when two mid-level city bureaucrats that were not involved in the process vociferously objected to a white artist representing a primarily black and Hispanic community.  They argued there was no way he could understand their plight.  Ahearn, a long time resident of the community, created realistic statues of figures he felt were representative of the community but he was charged with racism “raising a monument to the criminals.”  Three days after their installation, he voluntarily removed the works.

This story was chronicled in the New Yorker Magazine:

IN THE SOUTH BRONX about controversy over white sculptor John Ahearn’s public statues in a black & Latino neighborhood. Ahearn, a Roman Catholic, has chosen to live & work for the past 12 years in one of the poorest & most dangerous parts of the city. He began painting in college, when a psychic told him he was destined to be an artist. With his assistant Robert (Rigoberto) Torres, he makes life-castings of people in the neighborhood; he makes two of each person, giving one to the model. His sculptures–which have sold for as much as $40,000 & been exhibited in major museums–are in apartments throughout his South Bronx neighborhood. In 1986 he was commissioned by the city’s Percent for Art Program to create a public sculpture for the new station house of his local Police Precinct. He created painted bronze castings of three locals: Raymond Garcia & his pitbull; Corey Mann, with boom-box & basketball; & Daleesha, a street child. They were installed on a traffic island in front of the station house on Sept. 25, 1991. A local woman, Alcina Salgado, & two outsiders, Arthur Symes & Claudette LaMelle, led a protest against the sculptures as being politically incorrect, negative images. At the artist’s request, they were removed five days later. They are now in the yard of P.S.1 in Long Island City. Ahearn continues to operate his streetfront studio. (ABSTRACT from NEW YORKER)

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
 

2 responses to “Island Art Controversy”

  1. What the article from The New Yorker failed to emphasize was that the statues he created were that of a known drug dealer, crackhead and thief. And if Ahern’s qualifications to create those statues was because he lived in the community, what does that say about him about the KIND of company he kept? If his identification of Black and Hispanics were that of criminals, it can only identify what he sought from them and in my observation of him and the crowd he kept, were that of people who saw little of their future and he took advantage of that. What the article also failed to mention is that he had a relationship with most of the males in these neighborhoods and had such relationships in the guise of being an “artist who connected with the people”. In the end, it was for him to exploit his own sexual satisfaction in a community that shunned such behavior at the same time. If anyone would have found about his homosexuality, in that kind of neighborhood, his artwork would have 3x the value it has right now. I’m not knocking his talent in anyway, but like most people of his ilk, he hasn’t the slightest inkling of the many facets of people in that community. In short, he made a career exploiting those people and using them to hide who he really is. As far as Alcina Salgado is concerned, she was not a “community activist” per say. She was active in the community and you don’t need to be a community activist to voice your concern about how images are represented, especially when those statues are modeled after criminals in front of a police station. The reporter from The New Yorker NEVER bothered to find out who Alcina was and what was her reasons behind her protest. Like most typical reporters who see Black Communities through glass shields, was irresponsible reporting and an article created to showcase a man who himself has exploited the community in the guise of “connecting with the community”.

    [Reply]

  2. There is a really interesting book that covered this story called “Whose Art is it”
    http://www.amazon.com/Whose-Art-Public-Planet-Books/dp/0822315491
    I would recommend reading it- it goes in depth about the Ahearn situation.

    [Reply]

Leave a reply

 

Add an Image

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail without commenting:

You can also subscribe to the Islands of LA mailing list.